Rimon

Entries tagged “bankruptcy”

Insolvency of Alitalia Puts Creditors on Notice to Make Claims

insights Insolvency of Alitalia Puts Creditors on Notice to Make Claims Douglas J. Schneller · Insolvency of Alitalia Puts Creditors on Notice to Make Claims Emma R. Larson · Insolvency of Alitalia Puts Creditors on Notice to Make Claims Stephen Díaz Gavin · July 20, 2017

The May 2, 2017 bankruptcy filing for Alitalia might be the end of the journey for the troubled Italian flag carrier, but creditors in the U.S., Italy and elsewhere might still have a ticket to recover some claims. Alitalia has now also filed for bankruptcy protection in the U.S. under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy…

Continue Reading…

U.S. Supreme Court: Filing a Time-Barred Claim in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case Does Not Violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

insights U.S. Supreme Court: Filing a Time-Barred Claim in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case Does Not Violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Douglas J. Schneller · July 11, 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court recently issued a 5-3 decision holding that a creditor filing a proof of claim in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case for a time-barred debt was not false, deceptive, misleading, unconscionable or unfair conduct in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Learn more here. > You may also find this complementary…

Continue Reading…

U.S. Supreme Court: Purchaser of Defaulted Loans Not a Debt Collector Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act

insights U.S. Supreme Court: Purchaser of Defaulted Loans Not a Debt Collector Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Douglas J. Schneller · July 11, 2017

The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a purchaser for its own account of a defaulted loan is not a debt collector within the meaning of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Learn more here. > You may also find this complementary article of interest: U.S. Supreme Court: Filing a Time-Barred Claim in a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Case Does…

Continue Reading…

First Circuit: Bankruptcy Court “Retention of Jurisdiction” Provision Requires More Than Mere Words

insights First Circuit: Bankruptcy Court “Retention of Jurisdiction” Provision Requires More Than Mere Words Douglas J. Schneller · July 11, 2017

The First Circuit recently ruled that the bankruptcy court lacked the authority to adjudicate disputes under a contract because there was no “arising under,” “arising in” or “related to” jurisdiction — in spite of the fact that the contract itself, previously approved by the bankruptcy court, included a provision giving that court jurisdiction. Learn more here.…

Continue Reading…

Client Alert: 2nd Circuit Affirms Debtor’s Decision to Nix Sale After Market Price Increases

insights Client Alert: 2nd Circuit Affirms Debtor’s Decision to Nix Sale After Market Price Increases Douglas J. Schneller · June 9, 2017

In a decision that will be of interest to distressed investors and sellers and buyers of bankruptcy claims, the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court decision which permitted a claims seller – and debtor in bankruptcy – to disapprove a trade confirmation after the market price had risen…

Continue Reading…

​Rimon’s Article on ​The 7th Circuit’s View on Finality and Appealability in Bankruptcy​,​​ Published in Westlaw Journal​

insights August 23, 2016

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a decision regarding finality and appealability in bankruptcy. Rimon Partner, Pamela M. Egan, analyzes this decision and provides insight on when a party can appeal a bankruptcy court decision. The “takeaway is simple. The bank’s fraudulent-transfer action was just one tactic that it used to recover its claim. Although the tactic failed,…

Continue Reading…

Interplay Between Russian Bankruptcy and American Fraudulent Transfer Law

insights June 30, 2016

This article was published in the Russia and Eurasia Committee – Legislation Updates and News on the January-June 2016 edition. Ms. Egan describes two major differences between Russian bankruptcy and American bankruptcy: (1) the initial treatment of creditors’ claims and the burden of proof to establish them; and (2) the ability of creditors to sue a debtor…

Continue Reading…

Insights on Zachary vs. California Bank & Trust Case published in Journal of Bankruptcy Law

insights June 1, 2016

Published in this issue of Pratt’s Journal of Bankruptcy Law, Pamela Egan discusses a significant decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit holding that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act did not abrogate the absolute priority rule for individual chapter 11 debtors, but merely carved an exception. The Ninth Gets It Right—Absolute…

Continue Reading…