Rimon Law Blog

On September 1, 2009, the Government of the United Kingdom implemented the New Offshore Disclosure Opportunity (“NDO”).

 The NDO allows those individuals with unpaid UK taxes relating to previously undisclosed income and/or capital gains linked to offshore accounts and/or assets to settle related tax liabilities at a favorable 10% penalty rate.  Ordinarily, penalties are charged at up to 100% of the tax due.

The NDO provisions apply to all UK residents and certain non-UK domiciled individuals (who themselves may be or once were subject to tax in the UK) who have an interest in any Offshore Accounts, Trusts or Corporate entities that would otherwise be subject to UK tax. 

Under the NDO, formal notification of the intention to disclose must be given to Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) in the UK by November 30, 2009 at the latest.  The actual disclosure must be submitted to HMRC together with payment of related taxes and penalty charges by March 12, 2010 if the disclosure is done online or by January 31, 2010 if the disclosure is done on paper. 

Care needs to be taken when making this disclosure since, by submitting a request under the NDO, an individual does not automatically receive immunity from criminal prosecution.

The amnesty will apply if any income, capital gains and inheritance tax outstanding is paid in full together with (in most cases) an additional minimum of 10% penalty charge if any tax due is above £1,000 and any interest due on the unpaid tax .

The NDO will not affect as many people living outside the United Kingdom as the US Voluntary Disclosure Program did for those Americans living abroad, since many of them are no longer considered to be UK tax resident.  However, historic tax liabilities are under review by HMRC and recent immigrants from the UK in particular will need to consider their position in more depth.

In addition, those who are considered to be UK tax resident, for example under a relevant Tax treaty or under general UK law, but who are neither ordinarily resident nor domiciled in the UK (for tax), may be able to use the remittance basis to argue that the offshore income and gains were not taxable in the UK.  In many of those cases, tax would only be due on income or gains that were brought into the United Kingdom.

For additional information about the New Disclosure Opportunity please contact Dave Wolf, Esq. by email at dave.wolf@rimonlaw.com.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in a September 10, 2009 ruling, held that an employer can be held liable for discriminatory hiring decisions made by its independent contractors. The case involved an independent contractor acting on behalf of the employer, telling the plaintiff that “they were looking for someone younger”.

The Second Circuit ruled that, even if the hiring decision is made by the authorized independent contractor, the employer was still responsible for the discriminatory hiring decision by the independent contractors. In a worse scenario, even if the independent contractor does not have the actual authority but the applicant thought that it did (“apparent authority” in legal terms), the employer is still liable.

Considering the harsh economy and fewer job opportunities these days, employers should be more cautious since the job applicant is more inclined to sue if he/she cannot get the job. Employers should avoid asking job applicant questions such as race, religion, national origin, gender and age, etc during the interview process; when entering into the independent contractor contract, it is a good idea to add an indemnification clause asking the independent contractor to indemnify the employer for any liability arising from the hiring process conducted by the independent contractor.